The Journal/Sugar has 56 names. Here are the ones to watch.
Sugar has 56 names. Here are the ones to watch.
The Journal · Vol.003 · 09 Jun 2026
Nutrition

Sugar has 56 names. Here are the ones to watch.

M
Michelle Kedogo
9 June 20265 min read

The average food label lists sugar in at least two or three different forms. This is not accidental. When sugar appears under multiple names, each individual listing looks smaller. The total is the same. Understanding the names sugar travels under is one of the most practical things you can do as a food shopper. It does not require a nutrition degree. It just requires knowing the list.

The obvious ones

Sugar, cane sugar, raw sugar, brown sugar, powdered sugar. These are easy to spot and most people already read past them without concern. They are worth knowing simply because seeing them high in an ingredient list is informative.

The ones that sound natural

Honey, agave nectar, maple syrup, coconut sugar, date syrup, fruit juice concentrate, evaporated cane juice. These are widely marketed as healthier alternatives to refined sugar. From a nutritional standpoint, they are metabolised by the body in largely similar ways. They contain trace minerals the refined versions do not, but in the quantities typically found in food products, those traces are minimal. Choosing them over refined sugar is not meaningless. But treating them as categorically different requires more nuance than most product marketing provides.

The ones that are hardest to spot

Maltose, dextrose, fructose, glucose, glucose-fructose syrup, high-fructose corn syrup, maltodextrin, dextrin, barley malt, rice syrup, corn syrup solids. These names are less familiar, and that unfamiliarity is part of why they persist on labels. They are forms of sugar, some more processed than others, some more rapidly absorbed than table sugar.

Scientist's Note

The science: The World Health Organisation recommends keeping free sugars below 10% of total daily energy intake, with additional benefit observed below 5%. The scientific consensus is that total added sugar intake matters more than the specific form. The metabolic response to fructose, glucose, and sucrose differs in mechanism, but public health guidance addresses total intake rather than source differentiation for most people.

What to do with this

You do not need to memorise all 56 names. You just need to know that when an ingredient list contains several names you do not recognise that end in -ose or -syrup, you are likely looking at a product with more sugar than its front-of-pack suggests.

Look at the total sugars figure on the nutrition panel. More than 5g per 100g is worth noting in a product that is not marketed as a treat. More than 10g per 100g in an everyday staple is worth questioning.

Scientist's Note

The goal is not to avoid all sugar. It is to know when you are choosing it, and when it has been quietly added for you.

“Would I buy this for my own family?”

M
Michelle Kedogo
Founder · Biomedical scientist
M
Michelle Kedogo
Founder · Biomedical scientist

BSc Biomedical Sciences, MSc Molecular Medicine, and MRes Tissue Engineering for Regenerative Medicine (University of Manchester). 12 years in medical research, including 5 in medical diagnostics, before founding Local Greenz Market.

The Journal

Never miss a new article

New articles from Michelle, straight to your inbox. No spam, no brand partners.